Prepared for Boston Medical Center Health System  ·  2026 Cardiovascular Strategy Review  ·  Confidential
Cardiovascular Service Line · Three Hospitals · One Operating System

The 30 days after discharge are now on Boston Medical Center's books.

TEAM began January 1, 2026. All three BMC hospitals are mandatory participants, and the model reconciles every Medicare dollar spent in the 30 days after a surgical discharge. This is a remote cardiac care service line built for that window — heart failure, post-MI, post-CABG and structural heart, arrhythmia and device patients — that pays for itself on fee-for-service economics before a single episode is reconciled.

$0.00M24-Month Net
Reimbursement
0%Service Line
Margin
0Hospitalizations
Avoided (24 mo)
0Unique Patients in Active
Remote Care (Month 24)
Where BMC stands

Three cardiac programs, one Medicare footprint, and a model that just started scoring it.

In 2024 Boston Medical Center absorbed two hospitals out of the Steward collapse and became a three-campus system. The cardiovascular service line that resulted is unusual: the academic campus, the system's cardiac surgery and structural heart centre, and the highest-volume heart failure hospital are three different buildings. Everything below is drawn from CMS's own published files.

1,613

Medicare cardiovascular discharges

Circulatory-system discharges across the three hospitals, CY2024 Medicare fee-for-service. CMS suppresses cells under 11 discharges, so this is a floor.

3

Hospitals in mandatory TEAM

Boston Medical Center (CCN 220031), BMC–Brighton (220036) and BMC–South (220111) — all three mandatory participants for the full 2026–2030 term.

43.6%

Dual-eligible share, Suffolk County

Nearly half of Suffolk County Medicare beneficiaries are dual-eligible — the population with the highest post-discharge risk and the thinnest support between visits.

Where the cardiac volume actually sits

Cohort (MS-DRG)BMC BostonBMC–BrightonBMC–SouthCombined
Coronary artery bypass — the TEAM episode (231–236)6565
Cardiac valve / major cardiothoracic (216–221)3535
Endovascular valve replacement / TAVR (266, 267)107107
Heart failure and shock (291–293)16351225439
Acute myocardial infarction (280–282)3128165224
Arrhythmia and pacemaker (242, 243, 308–310)5544108207
Circulatory disorders with cardiac cath (286, 287)404734121
All circulatory discharges (MDC 5)3864847321,602

Source: CMS Medicare Inpatient Hospitals — by Provider and Service, data year 2024, queried by CCN. Medicare fee-for-service only — Medicare Advantage discharges are not in this file. Cells below 11 discharges are suppressed by CMS, so every figure is a floor. CY2024 largely predates integration: Brighton and South operated as St. Elizabeth's and Good Samaritan for most of that year.

The structural fact this creates. Cardiac surgery and structural heart are concentrated at Brighton. Heart failure is heaviest at South, in Brockton. The academic campus carries the tertiary and ECMO work. A remote care layer is the one piece of infrastructure that can be built once and run identically across all three — the patient is at home in every case.

And this is a nationally ranked cardiovascular programme

U.S. News 2025–26 — #42 nationally, Cardiology & Heart Surgery High Performing — Heart Failure High Performing — Pacemaker Implantation Brighton — High Performing, aortic valve & heart bypass surgery South — High Performing, heart attack care

U.S. News & World Report Best Hospitals, 2025–26 cycle. Cardiology, Heart & Vascular Surgery is one of four BMC specialties ranked in the national top 50.

Build vs partner

You have already proven remote monitoring works on this population. Just not in cardiology.

This is not a greenfield pitch, and it would be dishonest to make one. BMC has run device-based remote patient monitoring inside its own Epic environment since 2022. The results answered the three objections that usually stop a programme like this — and they answered them on BMC's own safety-net panel.

98.7%

Engagement, already demonstrated

Of 1,000 monitored patients in BMC's remote blood-pressure programme, 98.7% submitted at least one measurement, averaging 17 measurements each. The “our patients won't engage” objection has already been tested here and did not hold.

Equity

Engagement held across race and ethnicity

BMC reported that Black and Hispanic patients sent blood pressure measurements at statistically similar rates to white patients — a result most systems cannot show, and the one that matters most for a panel like BMC's.

Epic

The integration path already exists

The programme launched directly inside BMC's Epic workflow. A third-party remote monitoring application has already been brought into the chart, used by clinicians, and sustained — the technical precedent is set.

What it covers — and what it does not. That programme is scoped to postpartum and gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, and a hepatology cohort. There is no cardiology remote monitoring, chronic care management or transitional care management programme anywhere in the health system. The proof exists; the cardiovascular service line simply is not on it.

The cardiac pieces that exist today, and the gap between them

What BMC runs todayWhere it stops
Brighton Heart Failure Disease Management — a minimum of two telemedicine check-ins, at days 3 and 7 after discharge, explicitly to reduce readmissions. Two visits, no device data, no daily weights or blood pressures, and it ends on day 7. Structurally it is a transitional-care programme without the monitoring tail — and the TEAM window runs to day 30.
Hospital at Home — launched April 2024 with congestive heart failure among its qualifying diagnoses, with round-the-clock monitoring while the patient is admitted. It covers the patient while they are an inpatient under the CMS waiver. It does not follow them after the discharge, which is where the episode is scored.
Complex Care Management — RN- and social-work-led teams with community health workers, pharmacy and housing partners. Scoped to the Medicaid ACO population. It does not reach the Medicare fee-for-service cardiac panel, and no care-management billing codes are attached to it.
Cardiac rehabilitation at the main campus and the Pritikin intensive programme at Brighton, plus the Preventive Food Pantry and Teaching Kitchen, which runs classes specifically for cardiac and hypertension patients. Strong non-clinical infrastructure with nothing feeding it a daily physiologic signal. A monitored cohort would make these programmes targetable rather than opt-in.
BMC's own patient-facing telehealth page states the gap plainly. Its guidance on managing high blood pressure by video is conditioned on the patient having a blood pressure cuff at home. Today the device is the patient's problem to solve. In this service line the device ships, is cellular-connected, and is CoachCare's responsibility — along with the readings, the escalation and the claim.
Why 2026

TEAM is live, mandatory, and measured on the 30 days you currently don't staff.

The Transforming Episode Accountability Model began January 1, 2026 and runs through December 31, 2030. Boston-Cambridge-Newton (CBSA 14460) is a selected mandatory geography, and all three BMC hospitals appear on the CMS participant list as Mandatory — not voluntary.

CCN 220031 — Boston Medical Center

Mandatory · 01/01/2026–12/31/2030

All five episode categories

CCN 220036 — BMC–Brighton

Mandatory · 01/01/2026–12/31/2030

CABG episode sits here

CCN 220111 — BMC–South

Mandatory · 01/01/2026–12/31/2030

All five episode categories

What the model actually reconciles

An episode runs from admission through 30 days after discharge, and performance is measured on total Medicare Part A and Part B spend across that window — not on the readmission rate alone. Readmissions, ED visits, observation stays and post-acute utilisation all land inside it.

CABG is one of five priced episode categories, alongside major bowel, hip and femur fracture, lower-extremity joint replacement, and spinal fusion.

The one quality measure remote care moves

TEAM's PY1 Composite Quality Score is built on three measures: Hospital-Wide All-Cause Readmission (claims-only in PY1), CMS PSI 90, and the THA/TKA patient-reported outcome measure.

Hospital-Wide Readmission is the measure a post-discharge monitoring programme directly moves — and because it is hospital-wide, it is scored at all three campuses, not just the one performing CABG.

CABG target prices — New England, PY1 preliminary

MS-DRGBenchmarkTrend factorPreliminary target price
231$86,5341.0344$88,167
232$53,9771.0296$54,740
233$69,5641.0374$71,084
234$49,0611.0396$50,238
235$52,5251.0281$53,193
236$37,8141.0386$38,685

Source: CMS TEAM PY1 Preliminary Target Prices workbook (dated 2025-12-10), New England / Census Division 1, baseline 2022–2024, standardized dollars, CABG discount factor 1.5%. Target prices are published at DRG-by-region level; CMS has not published hospital-level CABG target prices.

TEAM lands on top of risk BMC already carries. BMC Integrated Care Services participates in the Medicare Shared Savings Program on the ENHANCED track — the maximum two-sided risk option — across roughly 9,505 assigned beneficiaries, a little over half of whom are dual-eligible. Total-cost-of-care accountability is already in place. TEAM adds episode-level accountability on the same patients, and post-discharge utilisation is the term both models share. One monitored cohort serves both.
And the codes changed in your favour on January 1. CY2026 added 99445 (device supply, 2–15 days of readings) and 99470 (treatment management, 10–19 minutes). Before 2026, a patient had to transmit 16 days in a 30-day period before anything was billable — which made the 30 days after a discharge, the window TEAM scores, the hardest window to bill for. That gap is now closed.
The evidence base

The care is excellent. The 30 days after it are where the exposure sits.

Every figure below is from CMS's own Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and Care Compare files for the 07/2021–06/2024 measurement period, released May 2026. An Excess Readmission Ratio above 1.0000 means CMS observed more readmissions than it expected after adjusting for that hospital's case mix.

Start with what CMS says BMC does better than almost anyone. The main campus is rated Better Than the National Rate on 30-day heart failure mortality — 7.1% against a national 11.6%, on 365 cases. That is a genuinely rare rating, and it says the inpatient heart failure care is excellent. The readmission numbers below sit alongside it, not against it. Both can be true at once, and together they locate the problem precisely: the gap is not in how BMC treats heart failure. It is in what happens once the patient goes home.
HRRP measure (excess readmission ratio)BMC BostonBMC–BrightonBMC–South
Heart failure0.98341.13831.1191
Acute myocardial infarction0.98341.26390.9600
Coronary artery bypass graft0.92731.0527not available
COPD1.08461.04531.0515
Pneumonia0.95640.93211.1044

The CABG centre is above expected on all three cardiac measures

BMC–Brighton — the campus that performs the CABG episode TEAM prices — carries an excess readmission ratio above 1.0 on heart failure (1.1383), acute MI (1.2639) and CABG (1.0527) at the same time. CMS rates its 30-day AMI readmission rate of 16.8% as “Worse Than the National Rate.”

Excess days tell the sharper story

Care Compare's excess-days measure counts all acute care after discharge, including ED visits and observation stays a readmission rate misses. Brighton runs +56.7 excess days per 100 AMI discharges and +31.7 per 100 heart failure discharges; South runs +22.0 on heart failure. Both are rated “More Days Than Average.”

Said plainly, and with the caveat that belongs with it. These are CMS's risk-adjusted figures, and CMS's adjustment is widely argued to under-correct for social risk. BMC serves the most dual-eligible-heavy Medicare population in Massachusetts, and that is the most plausible driver of these numbers. They are presented here as the exposure BMC is measured against under the rules it is scored by — not as a clinical judgment. It is also precisely why a structured, funded, daily-touch layer between discharge and the first follow-up visit is worth more here than at a hospital with a commercially insured panel.

Sources: CMS Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, Unplanned Hospital Visits and Complications and Deaths datasets, Provider Data Catalog, measurement period 07/01/2021–06/30/2024, released 2026-05-13. Heart failure denominators over the period: 457 (Boston), 249 (Brighton), 682 (South). Excess readmission ratios above 1.0 across all reported measures: 1 of 6 at Boston, 4 of 6 at Brighton, 4 of 5 at South.

The service line

One clinical spine, running from the discharge to the steady state.

The architecture is deliberately narrow: it starts where the risk is highest — the discharge — and hands the patient into longitudinal management without a gap. CoachCare supplies the enrollment engine, the devices, the monitoring team and the billing, so the service line does not depend on BMC hiring into it.

Step 1 · At discharge

Transitional Care Management

Interactive contact inside two business days, medication reconciliation, and a face-to-face visit inside 7 or 14 days. 99495 / 99496. This is the billable spine of the 30-day TEAM window.

Step 2 · Days 2–30

Short-window remote monitoring

Cellular blood pressure cuff and scale in the patient's hands before they leave. Daily weights and blood pressures reviewed by a monitoring team. 99445 / 99470 — the CY2026 codes that make a partial month billable.

Step 3 · Month 2 onward

Longitudinal RPM, CCM and PCM

The patient converts into ongoing chronic care management or principal care management with continued monitoring. 99454 / 99457 / 99490 / 99426. This is where the recurring economics sit.

CY2026 billing stack — Massachusetts rates

CodeWhat it covers2026 rate
99453RPM set-up and patient education (one-time)$25.72
99445RPM device supply — 2–15 days of readings (new for 2026)$62.11
99454RPM device supply — 16+ days of readings, per 30 days$62.11
99470RPM treatment management — 10–19 min (new for 2026)$29.32
99457RPM treatment management — first 20 min$58.29
99458RPM treatment management — each additional 20 min$45.93
99490Chronic care management — first 20 min$73.14
99439Chronic care management — each additional 20 min$56.13
99426Principal care management — first 30 min$75.14
99427Principal care management — each additional 30 min$60.47

CY2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, non-facility, MAC locality 14212-01 (Massachusetts) — resolved from ZIP 02118. Rates are locality-specific and update annually; confirm against the current fee schedule at contracting.

Medicare Advantage is inside these economics, not outside them. Roughly 37% of the Medicare beneficiaries in BMC's Suffolk and Plymouth catchment are enrolled in Medicare Advantage. Because MA plans must reimburse at no less than the Medicare rate, RPM, CCM and PCM economics are the same for those patients — the forecast treats the full Medicare population, not just fee-for-service.
And MassHealth is real upside that is deliberately left out of the forecast. Effective August 1, 2024, MassHealth pays remote patient monitoring codes 99091, 99453, 99454, 99457 and 99458 — and its eligible-condition list names congestive heart failure and hypertension explicitly. Eligibility keys on instability or deterioration risk: more than two hospitalisations or ED visits for the condition in 24 months, or a recent inpatient discharge. That is the same cohort this service line targets. Two rules shape how it is built: the device must come from the provider rather than a DME supplier or pharmacy, and while a vendor may manage the devices, billing must be done by the MassHealth-enrolled provider.

Given BMC's Medicaid case mix, this materially widens the addressable population — but every dollar modelled on this page is Medicare only. The MassHealth side is upside, and it should be scoped separately rather than assumed.

Source: MassHealth Transmittal Letter PHY-170 (July 2024), Physician Manual Subchapter 6. Whether MassHealth separately reimburses chronic care management or transitional care management as distinct benefits was not confirmed and must be verified before any Medicaid-side care-management revenue is counted.
Integration

It runs inside Epic, not beside it.

The programme lives in the Epic environment. Clinicians do not learn a second system, and there is no parallel worklist to maintain — enrollment, readings, documentation and claims all move through workflows the care teams already use.

The timing here is unusually clean. Brighton and South went live on BMC's Epic instance on November 1, 2025, and the last legacy read-only window closed on March 31, 2026. All three hospitals now sit on one Epic instance. A system-wide cardiovascular registry — one cohort definition, one enrollment flag, one worklist across three campuses — is technically possible for the first time, and the cutover is far enough back that it is no longer consuming the IT organisation.

1 · Integrated enrollment

Enrollment flags and trigger ordering sit inside the clinical workflow. The CoachCare team enrols qualified Medicare patients on BMC's behalf, and enrollment status is visible in Epic in real time.

2 · Exchange of health history

Bi-directional at intake, so the monitoring team works from the same problem list, medications and history as the clinic.

3 · Integrated discrete vitals

Device readings land in the chart as discrete vitals — trendable, reportable and usable in flowsheets — not as scanned PDFs.

4 · Compliance documentation

An integrated care summary writes audit-ready documentation into the record for every billed period.

5 · Automated claim generation

Claims are generated by the CoachCare billing engine — removing the manual per-patient, per-month claim step that quietly caps most in-house programmes.

Time to first service

Patients begin receiving CCM and RPM services in under five days from the enrollment flag.

“Key to achieving a program that is efficient, effective and sustainable is creating a seamless, intuitive user experience for the patient and provider — and that is what our integration with Epic accomplishes.”
Clinical governance & escalation

The economics prove it pays. This is what proves it is safe.

Every reading — across RPM, CCM and PCM — routes through one escalation engine. The rules below are the operating standard, not a description of intent, and they are what makes a monitored population defensible to a quality committee.

One shared escalation engine

  • Critical values escalate regardless of symptoms — no symptom check gates a critical reading.
  • Out-of-range but non-critical → retake and symptom check first, so the practice sees signal rather than noise.
  • Trend is defined objectively — three readings at least an hour apart for blood pressure or glucose, or three within seven days for heart rate.
  • Unreachable patients → voicemail and callback, and escalation proceeds anyway if the value is critical or a trend is established.
  • Every escalation documents vital, findings, method, contact, outcome and follow-up.

The emergent pathway

Chest pain · new shortness of breath · stroke signs · syncope · worst-ever headache · sudden swelling.

Any of these triggers a 911 call with the patient still on the line. If the patient refuses, they are routed to the clinic; if they remain at risk, CoachCare activates 911.

CoachCare's urgent and emergent policy supersedes any client-specific escalation preference. This is not configurable, and that is the point.

Three-way routing — so the clinic sees signal, not noise

Emergency

Routed to 911 immediately, with the practice notified.

Non-critical

Routed to a named, agreed member of the BMC care team — defined per campus during implementation.

Stable / resolved

Documented in the record as an FYI. No interruption generated.

The post-discharge cadence — where the readmission work actually happens

Any ER visit or hospitalisation in the last 60 days triggers a three-touch readmission-prevention sequence. This is the operational mechanism behind the modelled hospitalisations-avoided figure, and it maps directly onto the 30-day window TEAM reconciles.

Day 1–2

First contact. Medication reconciliation, symptom check, device set-up confirmed, red flags reviewed with the patient.

Day 5–8

Second contact. Adherence, weight and blood pressure trend, follow-up appointment confirmed and barriers to attending it addressed.

Day 12–14

Third contact. Stability confirmed, escalation if the trend has turned, and hand-off into longitudinal management.

Continuity is governed too. Unreachable patients are re-escalated on a fixed cadence rather than quietly dropped, and the practice is notified at every decision point — including discharge from the programme.
Value Analysis

What the service line produces over 24 months.

Modelled on an estimated 2,091 remote-care-eligible cardiovascular patients across the three campuses, at Massachusetts Medicare rates, with one CoachCare-funded on-site enrollment specialist. Illustrative and modelled — verify against BMC's own chart counts.

Active program enrollments

By program, months 1–24

Monthly economics

Net reimbursement, CoachCare fees and service line margin

Net reimbursement mix

24-month total by program
Financial summaryYear 1Year 224 months
Net reimbursement$1,203,050$1,481,795$2,684,844
CoachCare fees$708,404$856,098$1,564,502
Service line margin$494,645$625,697$1,120,342
Margin %41.1%42.2%41.7%
The on-site enrollment specialist is staffed at CoachCare's expense. It is embedded value in this model, never a deduction from the service line margin — BMC adds no headcount to run this.
88,687

Physiologic readings

Captured and reviewed over 24 months.

56

Hospitalisations avoided

Modelled from RPM patient-months over 24 months.

22,211

Care team hours saved

About 10.7 FTE-equivalents of care management labour.

1,109

Active enrollments at M24

RPM 377 · CCM 366 · PCM 366 — equal to 732 unique patients after de-duplication.

Read the ramp honestly. This programme reaches its enrollment ceiling early — RPM by month 4, CCM by month 5, PCM by month 8 — and then holds flat. That is what a concentrated, well-defined cardiovascular cohort looks like: it saturates inside a year. The implication is not that the forecast is capped; it is that the same enrollment, device, monitoring and billing engine has spare capacity from month 9 onward, and the next service line costs far less to add than the first.
Scenario Explorer

Change the assumptions and watch the model move.

This calculator runs the same enrollment engine as the Value Analysis and reproduces its 24-month output exactly at the default settings. Move the panel size to the number BMC's own chart counts support — that is the input worth arguing about.

$0.00M
24-mo net reimbursement
$0.00M
24-mo service line margin
0
Active enrollments at M24
0
Hospitalisations avoided

Enrollment trajectory

Active program enrollments under the current scenario

The census shown is total active program enrollments — a patient enrolled in both RPM and CCM counts twice here. The headline “unique patients” figure elsewhere on this page is de-duplicated.

Getting there

From this document to a running service line.

  1. Validate the population — 2 weeks

    Replace the modelled 2,091-patient estimate with BMC's own counts from Epic: heart failure, post-MI, post-CABG and structural heart, and device patients across all three campuses. Every number in this analysis re-runs off that one input.

  2. Scope the pilot — 30 days

    Start where the evidence points: the post-discharge cohort at one campus. Brighton concentrates the surgical episode risk; South concentrates heart failure volume. Either is a defensible first site, and the choice is BMC's.

  3. Integrate and launch — 60–90 days

    Epic integration, escalation routing agreed per campus, devices staged, and the CoachCare-funded enrollment specialist on site. Patients begin receiving services within five days of the first enrollment flag.

  4. Measure, then extend — months 4–12

    Track 30-day readmissions and excess days in the monitored cohort against the campus baseline. Once the engine is running, extending it to the second and third campus — and to the next service line — is incremental.

About CoachCare

The experience to get it right.

500,000+

Patients managed

Across more than 400 managed conditions.

10,000+

Providers

Committed to remote care excellence.

1,000+

Implementations

Successful in-market programme launches.

5M+

Claims generated

Care plan coding and billing at scale.

100M+

Vitals recorded

Physiologic readings captured and reviewed.

4M+

Care actions

Enabled through the platform.

Download the Full Executive Report (PDF)
Assumptions & sources

Everything behind the numbers.

How the eligible population was estimated

Sized from CMS Medicare Inpatient Hospitals — by Provider and Service (data year 2024), queried by CCN for all three BMC hospitals. Circulatory-system discharges (MDC 5, DRG 215–316) totalled 1,602, plus 11 ECMO discharges. The remote-care-eligible subset — heart failure, acute MI, cardiac surgical and structural heart, arrhythmia and device, circulatory disorders with catheterisation, hypertension and other circulatory diagnoses — totalled 1,316; syncope, chest pain, peripheral vascular disorders, amputation and other vascular procedures were excluded.

Because the CMS file contains fee-for-service discharges only, the figure was grossed up for Medicare Advantage at the catchment penetration of 37.05% (Suffolk and Plymouth counties, weighted by each county's BMC discharge volume; CMS Medicare Monthly Enrollment, April 2026), giving an estimated 2,091 eligible patients and a total cardiovascular Medicare population of about 2,562.

This is a discovery-stage estimate and almost certainly a floor. CMS suppresses discharge cells under 11, and inpatient discharges capture only the fraction of an ambulatory cardiology panel admitted in a given year. It is the single input most worth replacing with BMC's own chart counts.

Rates, locality and how reimbursement was calculated

All CPT rates resolve from ZIP 02118 to MAC locality 14212-01 (Massachusetts) against the CY2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, non-facility. Massachusetts is a comparatively high-reimbursement locality. Net reimbursement is modelled after denials, coinsurance and bad debt, not gross charges. Rates are locality-specific and revised annually.

Enrollment engine and the ramp

Enrollment is driven by three pathways: provider referral (8 referrals per provider per month at an 80% acceptance rate), one CoachCare-funded on-site enrollment specialist (80 enrollments per month at capacity), and telephonic outreach. All three ramp over the first four months. Monthly attrition is 1.5%. Conversion is 30% for RPM and 25% for CCM and PCM, applied to program-specific eligibility of 60% (RPM) and 70% (CCM and PCM). Enrollment begins in month 1 — there is no onboarding delay in the model.

Program ceilings are reached at month 4 (RPM), month 5 (CCM) and month 8 (PCM), after which the census holds flat.

Unique patients versus active enrollments

At month 24 the model carries 1,109 active program enrollments — RPM 377, CCM 366, PCM 366. Because a patient may carry both a monitoring and a care-management enrollment, these are de-duplicated to 732 unique patients. Charts and the Scenario Explorer show enrollments; the headline figure shows unique patients.

Clinical and operational value

Hospitalisations avoided are modelled from RPM patient-months using the workbook's standard reduction assumption, and are an illustrative projection, not a guarantee or a clinical claim. Care team hours saved are modelled from task volumes and converted to FTE at 2,080 hours per year.

CMS model verification — what was checked and how

TEAM. Verified against the CMS TEAM Participant List (June 2026 rendition, hospital data as of April 15, 2026) on two gates: CBSA 14460 (Boston-Cambridge-Newton) is a selected mandatory geography, and CCNs 220031, 220036 and 220111 each appear individually as Mandatory participants for 01/01/2026–12/31/2030. All three CCNs were independently confirmed against the CMS Hospital General Information dataset. CMS refreshes the participant list quarterly.

Readmissions. CMS Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and Unplanned Hospital Visits datasets, measurement period 07/01/2021–06/30/2024.

Ambulatory Specialty Model. Checked and found not applicable. Boston-Cambridge-Newton is not on the CMS ASM mandatory geography list, and no BMC clinician appears on the CY2027 participant file. No ASM content appears anywhere in this analysis.

What this document is not

Every financial figure is illustrative and modelled from public CMS data and published fee schedules — not a quotation, a contract, or a guarantee of results. It has not been reconciled against BMC's internal volumes, payer mix, contracts or cost structure. Pricing is indicative and subject to contracting.